Sex organ is the forbidden meat

-
Nowadays, seldom you could find a preacher teaching "oral sex" as forbidden "meat eating". Instead, you could find priests and preachers, who are fun of sex organs. At the same time, they are silent on the issue and some are allegedly forgiving and accommodating to homosexuals, lesbians and heterosexuals, who are also sexually "eating" the same organs.

Consequently, you may have reasons to doubt on their sexuality and orientations. These doubts are
based on Genesis 9:4 which states: "4The one thing you must not eat is meat with blood still in it; I forbid this because the life is in the blood" (Today's English Version) and the following premises, to wit:

First premise- the reason for prohibiting "eating meat with blood still in it" is because "life is in the blood" and not because "blood is life" or because of "blood" in meat.

Second premise-if you take out "life" in blood, you consequently take out the prohibition. In  other words, if you "eat meat with blood still in it" with no more life in  blood in meat, then the reason is no longer present, hence, no longer within the prohibition.

Third premise-if you take out the blood then the result is likewise taking out life in it, thus, it will not also fall within the prohibition because the life is no longer present in meat even if you put blood in meat afterwards.Thus, life is not sine qua non or equivalent to blood.  

In fine, what is being referred in the verse is an alive meat because there is "life" in blood in  an alive meat.

Fourth premise-the use of verb eat in the verse, which can not be done literally on alive meat, the verb "bite" being appropriate, can drive one into a conclusion that it's use is not to be understood literally but colloquially, as in "oral sex" or sexually eating the human genitals.

Ergo, "sexually eating the human genitals" as in "oral sex"  is being prohibited in Genesis 9:4.

Unfortunately, some preachers have been/are busy teaching on animal meats to the point of prohibiting blood transfusion to the prejudice of patients. Is there any eating of meat being involved in blood transfusion to qualify the act under the prohibition?

Worst, ask some priests or a cardinal on what they have done to the prohibited meat.

Also, why are the Americans legalizing eating the prohibited meat? Are they showing their status as a world (not heavenly) superpower, to the point of doing it? On its part, France is also adopting the so-called "same-sex marriage"/eating meat legislation. Is it because France is also a world((ly) and not a heavenly) power?

Click to The Oral Sex Theory to have a comprehensive understanding.

Comments

Post a Comment

Popular posts from this blog

Legal Pornography: Only in the Philippines

-
Image
Simultaneous multiple same-sex sexual relations was legalized by President Benigno Aquino III. This is inside Reproductive Health Law or R.A 10354, otherwise known as "“An Act Providing for National Policy on Responsible Parenthood and Reproductive Health”. Also, the law modified the traditional concept of parenthood due to its letter and spirit, which include persons and their multiple same-sex partners as parents. These are the leg al propositions. All Filipino lesbians , homosexuals , including sexual perverts and pornographers must therefore thank President Benigno Aquino III for this benefit. Because, the President had finally proven to them that they are his "boss" too. Therefore,instead of criticizing the President, they, including homosexual priests, should stop, as he had not only signed but also urgently made into law a health law,  purposely,  for the sake of their  "lust" , at the cost of taxing-paying Filipino public, inc
Read more

Forbidden meat

-
Image
The statement related to forbidden meat is:" The one thing you must not eat is meat with blood still in it ."  Most persons focus on the literal meat that even children may eat, however, as will be presented in the series of articles, the meat that is being prohibited will unlikely be eaten by children but will be vigorously eaten by the adults. Book of Genesis verses related to forbidden meat were spoken to Noah after the flood. Cautiously,  when someone prohibits an act right after a very traumatic event, such as flood, the essence of the prohibition is more related to the root causes of the event.    Specifically, the verses will be discussed in relation to " same-sex marriage " , including " oral sex " , " eating uncooked meat ", sodomy and reproductive health law. The influence of United States through "same-sex marriage" shall also be discussed, including the Philippine reproductive health law and its repercu
Read more

Human Life in Forbidden Meat

-
Image
In the previous article entitled Forbidden Meat , it was asked whether not not the word "life" stated in Genesis 9:4 refers only to "human" life to the exclusion of "animal" life. For immediate reference, the verse is restated, to wit; 4The one thing you must not eat is meat with blood still in it. I forbid this because the life is in the blood.(Genesis 9:4, TEV) The question is important because life is presently understood to include animal life. Due to this orientation, most believers consider the forbidden "meat with blood still in it" as referring only to "any" animal meat to the technical exclusion of human meat due to ordinary expectation for preachers to believe that nobody will eat "human meat", even if "human blood" is no longer on it. The materiality of life in the interpretation of the verse is that when it refers only to "human" life then correspondingly, the meat and blood being stat
Read more